JrKripto - Everything about Crypto

Binance Alpha to Remove 7 Tokens from Its Featured List

<p class="text-left mb-4 ">Binance Alpha has decided to remove seven tokens from its featured list following recent reviews. The decision covers PTB, AA, OWL, DORA, ELIZAOS, MEMES, and 哭哭马. However, users will still be able to sell and withdraw these assets.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">In its October 23 announcement, Binance said the projects failed to meet Alpha’s standards. The platform scheduled the removal for October 23 at 09:30 UTC. The seven tokens will therefore lose their place among Alpha’s featured assets.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The announcement concerns <a href="https://jrkripto.com/tr/exchanges/binance" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="text-primary underline">Binance </a>Alpha’s featured list. Binance did not announce a suspension of sales or withdrawals for these assets. It also shared the menus and steps users can follow to continue their transactions.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Which tokens is Binance Alpha removing?</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Binance’s list includes seven tokens from different projects. The platform listed the token symbols and project names as follows:</p><ul class="list-disc list-inside my-4"><li>PTB: Portal to Bitcoin</li><li>AA: ARAI</li><li>OWL: Owlto Finance</li><li>DORA: DORA</li><li>ELIZAOS: elizaOS</li><li>MEMES: memes will continue</li><li>哭哭马: 错版马</li></ul><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Binance based its decision on recent assessments. The company said these tokens did not meet Alpha’s standards. However, the announcement did not provide individual reasons for each project.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The notice therefore does not explain which criteria each project failed to meet. Binance also disclosed no project-specific technical problems or security breaches. Its stated justification remained limited to compliance with Alpha’s standards.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The company reiterated its commitment to supporting innovation and transparency. It also identified user protection as a priority. For updates, Binance directed users to Binance Wallet’s official X account.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Sales and withdrawals will remain available</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The key detail for users is that access to their assets will continue. Binance confirmed that users can still sell and withdraw the tokens after their removal. The change to Alpha’s list therefore leaves the transaction channels outlined in the notice open.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Users wishing to withdraw tokens can open the “Asset” tab and select “Alpha” in Binance. They can then tap “Withdraw” and choose the relevant token. Binance outlined this route for withdrawals.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Users wishing to sell can also access “Alpha” through the “Asset” tab. They need to select the relevant token, followed by “Instant” and “Sell.” This keeps a selling option available for assets leaving the featured list.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Those using Binance Wallet can navigate to the “Market” tab. From there, they can search for the relevant token and select “Trade.” The company included this option in its announcement.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The notice does not specify a separate deadline for sales or withdrawals. Users can monitor Binance’s official channels for subsequent changes. The instructions reflect the guidance available when the announcement was published.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Binance warns of high volatility</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Binance also highlighted the risks associated with Alpha tokens. The company said these assets may carry higher-than-normal risks. It also reminded users that prices could experience significant volatility.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The platform urged users to research projects and apply appropriate risk management before trading. The notice also opens with a general warning about scams and fund security. However, Binance made no specific fraud allegations against the seven projects.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">This distinction matters when assessing the scope of the decision. The announcement says the tokens failed to meet Alpha’s standards, without providing project-specific findings. It therefore offers no basis for assuming every token faces the same technical or financial problem.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Binance also noted that products and services may vary by region. The options available to users may depend on their location. The notice does not guarantee access to the same services across all regions.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The change affects the seven tokens’ visibility on Alpha’s featured list. Users can continue selling and withdrawing through the channels Binance outlined. Official announcements remain the source for further updates regarding these projects.</p>

23 Oct 2026

Bitcoin ETFs Shed $635 Million as Inflow Streak Ends

<p class="text-left mb-4 ">U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs ended a three-day inflow streak with substantial withdrawals. The funds recorded $635.49 million in net outflows on Thursday, October 22. Ethereum, Solana, and Hyperliquid funds also saw withdrawals, while XRP products attracted fresh capital.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Combined data for <a href="https://jrkripto.com/tr/bitcoin-etfs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="text-primary underline">Bitcoin</a>, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Hyperliquid show approximately $758.83 million in net outflows. This calculation covers only ETFs tracking those five assets. It therefore does not represent the entire U.S. crypto ETF market.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Bitcoin funds recorded the largest withdrawals of the day. Ethereum ETFs followed with $110.50 million in net outflows. Together, funds tracking the two largest cryptocurrencies lost $745.99 million.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">BlackRock and Fidelity lead Bitcoin ETF outflows</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Market data show that BlackRock’s IBIT recorded $254.05 million in net outflows. Fidelity’s FBTC followed with withdrawals of $217.46 million. Together, the two funds accounted for approximately 74% of daily net Bitcoin ETF outflows.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">ARK Invest and 21Shares’ ARKB also recorded $109.43 million in withdrawals. Grayscale’s GBTC lost $29.53 million, while Bitwise’s BITB saw $27.35 million leave. Morgan Stanley’s MSBT moved in the opposite direction, attracting $2.33 million.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Farside Investors’ table shows a similar distribution across the same funds. However, Farside puts total daily net outflows at $635.6 million. Although the two data providers report slightly different figures, both show the same direction.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">One day of withdrawals erased much of the three-day recovery</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Bitcoin ETFs had started the week strongly. According to Farside, the funds attracted $526.7 million in net inflows on October 19. They then added $23.2 million on October 20 and $524.8 million on October 21.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Total inflows across those three sessions reached approximately $1.075 billion. Thursday’s withdrawals erased roughly 59% of that amount. Nevertheless, the first four trading days of the week still generated $439.1 million in net inflows.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The comparison highlights the difference between daily flows and the weekly picture. Despite Thursday’s sharp reversal, earlier inflows have not disappeared entirely. Friday’s flows will determine where the weekly total ends.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Ethereum’s brief recovery ends</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Ethereum ETFs also returned to outflows on October 22. Daily figures sourced from SoSoValue show net withdrawals of $110.50 million. Farside’s calculation for the same session stands at $110.6 million.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">In Farside’s table, BlackRock’s ETHA led withdrawals with $75.5 million. ETHB recorded $17.2 million in outflows, while Grayscale’s ETHE lost $9.6 million. Grayscale’s ETH fund also saw withdrawals of $10.7 million.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Meanwhile, Fidelity’s FETH attracted $2.4 million in net inflows. That amount was insufficient to offset withdrawals from the other products.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Ethereum funds had attracted $14.9 million in net inflows during the previous session. The latest withdrawals brought total net outflows across the week’s first four days to $225.1 million. Ethereum therefore diverged from Bitcoin, which retained net inflows over the same period.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">XRP attracts inflows as Solana and Hyperliquid see withdrawals</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">XRP ETFs recorded $3.55 million in net inflows on October 22. Solana funds lost $8.51 million, while Hyperliquid funds saw withdrawals of $7.88 million. Among these five assets, XRP was the only category to finish with positive net flows.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">However, XRP’s inflows remained far below the withdrawals across the other four categories. Bitcoin and Ethereum accounted for the bulk of outflows within the group. The latest figures show that early-week Bitcoin ETF demand failed to persist on Thursday, while altcoin fund flows diverged.</p>

23 Oct 2026

Coinbase Faces €3.25 Million Fine Over Customer

<p class="text-left mb-4 ">The Central Bank of Ireland announced a fine against <a href="https://jrkripto.com/tr/exchanges/coinbase-exchange" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-primary underline">Coinbase’s</a> Irish unit for failing to meet customer fund safeguarding obligations. The approximately €3.25 million penalty also covers shortcomings in its oversight of outsourced services. Coinbase said customers suffered no financial losses or problems accessing their funds.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">In its announcement on Thursday, October 22, the regulator said it reached a settlement a day earlier. The investigation covers breaches between November 1, 2020, and August 19, 2025. Coinbase Ireland admitted violating its obligations under electronic money regulations.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Under the settlement, the company accepted a reprimand alongside the financial penalty. However, the sanctions require confirmation from Ireland’s High Court before taking effect. The announcement therefore outlines the settlement, while court confirmation remains pending.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Customer fund safeguarding accounts faced shortfalls</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Coinbase Ireland operates as one of the group’s electronic money service providers. The company issues electronic money in exchange for customers’ fiat currency. Customers can then use those balances to purchase crypto assets on Coinbase’s platform.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">This activity carries specific obligations to protect customer funds. Outsourcing services does not remove the company’s responsibility for those processes. The Central Bank’s investigation examined both safeguarding arrangements and oversight of outsourced services.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">According to the regulator’s findings, Coinbase Ireland relied excessively on US-based group companies for safeguarding processes. The local entity also lacked sufficient expertise to oversee the management of customer funds. Weak system design and insufficient control testing allowed prolonged shortfalls in the safeguarding account.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">According to the settlement notice, daily safeguarding shortfalls reached €5.2 million in 2024. The investigation also found that some customer funds entered accounts belonging to other Coinbase entities. Those funds therefore went into accounts other than those held in Coinbase Ireland’s name.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The issue affected approximately 30 institutional customers between March 2023 and October 2024. These customers deposited dollars into accounts held by Coinbase Inc., rather than Coinbase Ireland. Some customers transferring from the UK entity also had funds entering its UK safeguarding account until August 2025.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Coinbase says customers suffered no losses</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Coinbase said it resolved the issues under investigation and strengthened its customer fund safeguarding controls. The company also said it voluntarily reported some problems to the Central Bank in January 2024.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">According to Coinbase, no customer suffered financial losses because of these issues. Customers also retained access to their funds. The company stressed that the shortcomings related to past operations.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">A company spokesperson also addressed the circumstances behind the problems in comments to Reuters. The spokesperson said they largely arose while Coinbase took steps to protect customers during significant disruptions.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The Central Bank emphasized payment and electronic money firms’ responsibility to safeguard customer funds. Karen O’Leary, the regulator’s director of enforcement, said it had no tolerance for weaknesses in these arrangements.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Settlement reduced the penalty by 30%</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The Central Bank initially determined a financial penalty of €4,646,597 for the breaches. It then applied a 30% reduction under its settlement framework. This brought the amount accepted by the company to €3,252,618.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Another Irish company within the Coinbase group faced a financial penalty last year. In November 2025, the Central Bank announced an approximately €21.46 million fine against Coinbase Europe. That case concerned transaction monitoring failures under anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing requirements.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">In the earlier investigation, the regulator found that the company failed to properly monitor over 30 million transactions. The latest case focuses on Coinbase Ireland’s customer fund safeguarding and oversight of outsourced services. The two enforcement actions concern different companies within the same group and separate regulatory obligations.</p>

22 Oct 2026

Six Crypto Organizations Send Joint Letter to SEC

<p class="text-left mb-4 ">Six crypto organizations have urged the SEC to incorporate its digital commodity classification into binding rules. Their joint letter seeks a more durable legal foundation for certain <a href="https://jrkripto.com/tr/analytics" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-primary underline">crypto assets</a>. The organizations argue that existing interpretations provide insufficient certainty for developers and market participants.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The signatories include the Stellar Development Foundation, Hedera, Aptos Labs and Ava Labs. The Cardano Foundation and Chainlink Labs also joined the initiative. These organizations operate within the XLM, HBAR, APT, AVAX, ADA and LINK ecosystems, respectively.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 "> <figure class="my-6"> <img src="https://minio-api-1.jrkripto.com/blog/ekran-g-r-nt-s-2026-10-22-131745-78c1e676.webp" alt="Ekran görüntüsü 2026-10-22 131745.png" width="auto" height="auto" class="w-full rounded-lg border" /> </figure> </p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The submission focuses on the SEC’s proposed “Regulation Crypto Assets” framework. The six organizations want the digital commodity definition incorporated directly into the regulation’s operative provisions. Their goal is to give the SEC’s existing approach a firmer regulatory foundation.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Calls for Stronger Protection of Digital Commodity Status</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The debate centers on the distinction between the SEC’s explanatory statements and the proposal’s binding provisions. According to the organizations, the proposal references the digital commodity classification in its preamble. However, the rule text itself does not establish that classification with equal clarity.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The joint letter calls for preserving the approach the SEC outlined in March. In its earlier interpretation, the agency identified Bitcoin and Ether as examples of digital commodities. XRP, ADA, LINK, AVAX, HBAR, XLM and APT also appeared among those examples.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The signatories consider reliance on regulatory interpretation alone insufficient. They argue that incorporating the digital commodity definition into formal rules would reduce legal uncertainty. The request particularly concerns teams developing products and planning investments over longer periods.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The letter itself does not represent an SEC decision granting these assets a new status. The organizations are requesting changes to the proposed framework to reinforce the existing approach. Their submission therefore does not mean the SEC has accepted their request or implemented new rules.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Token Sales and Asset Status Require Separate Assessments</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Another central issue is the legal distinction between a token and its sale. Under certain circumstances, a company’s token sale may involve an investment contract. However, the organizations stress that this does not automatically make the token itself a security.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The letter therefore requests an explicit provision stating that digital commodities are not securities. It also proposes preserving that distinction when a digital commodity is subject to an investment contract. This would separate the asset’s characteristics from the commitments made during its sale.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The organizations’ approach addresses a central question in the debate over crypto regulation. The circumstances surrounding a token sale can affect which rules apply to the transaction. The joint submission also seeks clarity on how that assessment affects subsequent uses of the token.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Letter Also Addresses Secondary-Market Transactions</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The letter proposes a clearer framework for secondary-market transactions on exchanges. The organizations request a default presumption for digital commodity sales by parties other than the issuer. Without outstanding issuer commitments concerning essential managerial efforts, they want a presumption that these transactions involve no investment contract.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The submission also emphasizes the voluntary nature of the proposal’s “Rule 400” safe harbor. The organizations argue that using this mechanism should not constitute an admission that an investment contract previously existed. Choosing not to use it should not, by itself, create a presumption to the contrary.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The SEC’s official timetable set October 20, 2026, as the deadline for comments on the proposal. Published in August, the proposal outlines a new framework for investment contracts involving crypto assets. The close of the comment period does not automatically bring the regulation into force.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The six organizations aim to reduce uncertainty surrounding asset classification throughout this process. Industry representatives want the SEC to reinforce its earlier interpretations through explicit provisions in the final regulation. The agency’s response will be an important issue as the rulemaking process advances.</p>

22 Oct 2026

Tesla Holds Onto Bitcoin as It Reports Third-Quarter Results

<p class="text-left mb-4 ">Tesla maintained its <a href="https://jrkripto.com/tr/coin/btc" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="text-primary underline">Bitcoin </a>reserves in the third quarter of 2026. Its holdings remained at 11,509 BTC, while the balance sheet value of its digital assets increased. The electric vehicle maker continued to hold its Bitcoin position throughout the reporting period.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The company released its financial results on Wednesday, October 21, after U.S. markets closed. Third-quarter revenue reached approximately $28.05 billion. Tesla reported roughly $28.10 billion in revenue during the same period last year.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">For the crypto market, the distinction between reserve size and valuation stood out. Tesla maintained its Bitcoin holdings as price movements increased their accounting value. This illustrates how corporate crypto portfolios can affect financial results without any trading activity.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Tesla’s Digital Assets Reach $962 Million</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The carrying value of Tesla’s digital assets reached $962 million at the end of September. The same balance sheet item stood at $674 million at the end of June. That represents a quarterly increase of $288 million, or approximately 42.7%.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The company recorded a $288 million pretax unrealized gain on digital assets during the third quarter. The after-tax figure totaled $224 million. These figures highlight the contribution of Tesla’s Bitcoin holdings to its financial results.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">An unrealized gain does not mean the company generated cash by selling Bitcoin. Instead, Tesla reflects changes in the quarter-end value of its holdings in its financial statements. Investors therefore need to distinguish between reserve size and its reported dollar value.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The increase in digital assets also matches the reported unrealized gain. This suggests price movements drove the portfolio’s higher valuation. Current reports likewise indicate that Tesla’s Bitcoin holdings remained unchanged.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">The $962 million figure represents the balance sheet value as of September 30. Subsequent Bitcoin price movements can change the portfolio’s current market value. The reported figure therefore should not serve as a real-time valuation.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Revenue Holds Steady as Net Income Falls</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Tesla’s total third-quarter revenue declined approximately 0.2% year over year. The company reported revenue of $28.046 billion. Revenue stood at $28.095 billion during the same period last year.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Profitability, however, showed a more pronounced decline. Net income fell from $1.373 billion a year earlier to $787 million. Operating income also dropped from $1.624 billion to $718 million.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Tesla nevertheless ended the quarter with positive cash flow. The company generated approximately $6.26 billion in operating cash flow. After capital expenditures, free cash flow totaled around $1.53 billion.</p><h2 class="text-left text-foreground text-3xl font-bold mb-3 mt-1">Bitcoin Holdings Remain Unchanged From the Previous Quarter</h2><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Tesla’s SEC report covering the period ended June provides an important reference point. In that report, the company stated that 11,509 Bitcoin represented most of its digital assets. It disclosed a total acquisition cost of $386 million for those holdings.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Reports covering the third quarter show the same Bitcoin balance. The main change between the two periods therefore concerns the reserves’ dollar value. Tesla’s existing position continues to expose its balance sheet to Bitcoin price movements.</p><p class="text-left mb-4 ">Maintaining its reserves does not, by itself, represent a commitment to future purchases. The available figures describe Tesla’s position at the end of the third quarter. Both its Bitcoin balance and valuation gains will remain relevant in future earnings reports.</p>

22 Oct 2026

Altcoin

Binance Alpha to Remove 7 Tokens from Its Featured Listabout 22 hours ago

BTC, Altcoin

Bitcoin ETFs Shed $635 Million as Inflow Streak Endsabout 23 hours ago

Regulation

Coinbase Faces €3.25 Million Fine Over Customer 1 day ago

Regulation

Six Crypto Organizations Send Joint Letter to SEC2 days ago

BTC

Tesla Holds Onto Bitcoin as It Reports Third-Quarter Results2 days ago

Altcoin

Binance Alpha to Remove 7 Tokens from Its Featured Listabout 22 hours ago

BTC, Altcoin

Bitcoin ETFs Shed $635 Million as Inflow Streak Endsabout 23 hours ago

Regulation

Coinbase Faces €3.25 Million Fine Over Customer 1 day ago

Regulation

Six Crypto Organizations Send Joint Letter to SEC2 days ago

BTC

Tesla Holds Onto Bitcoin as It Reports Third-Quarter Results2 days ago

Coin Leaderboards

Trend Coins

Biggest Gainers

Biggest Losers

Do you have any questions?Feel free to send us your questions or request a free consultation.Contact Us

PlatformNewsCrypto CalendarEconomics CalendarGlossary

AnalyticsCryptocurrenciesExchangesToken UnlocksPortfolio

CompanyAboutContact UsChatF.A.Q.

Get the App

Google PlayApp Store

© 2026 All rights reserved

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service